Draft. Inspect. Approve.

Choose a workflow and sources, refine the question, then review the resulting claims.

Your working modelResearch review workspace

3 of 3 sources selected

Scripted synthesis · review required

Decision brief

Workspace dataHuman review

Research question

51/180

Choose sourcesDiscovery workshopNotes · updated 08 JulDecision criteria, open questions, and proposed owners.Interview digest6 excerpts · updated 03 JulRecurring needs, a minority signal, and unresolved context.Research summaryBrief · updated 27 JunSupported observations, limits, and follow-up questions.

01Ready

Choose the sources, refine the question, then build a review draft.

06Human-governed automation

Move faster with control.

Give each output an owner, exception path, and approval gate.

A controlled evidence archive representing human-governed AI operations

Governance signalReviewer required2 claims ready · 1 escalated

Evidence stays inspectable

The original record, passage, and support stay close to the output.

Automation has an owner

Every workflow names the person responsible for quality and exceptions.

Human approval is deliberate

Generation does not become distribution until the right person approves it.

Limits remain visible

Conflicts, gaps, assumptions, and model boundaries remain explicit.

Review proposed controls